Chapters 2 and 3 of Mere Sexuality did a nice job of laying down further framework for the biblical framework of sexuality that has been accepted by the Church for almost all of its history. They were both good chapters, though since I’m a bit of a contrarian, I’ll start out with what I felt were negative or weak points.
Chapter 2 has an intriguing title, “The Sexuality of Jesus.” I don’t want to say that it didn’t live up to its name. As I read Mere Sexuality, I’m realizing there are 3 categories that the broad term “sexuality” encompasses. One is gender / transgenderism, one is orientation / LGBTQ+, and the other would be what is sometimes called “sexual purity,” more or less meaning pornography, sex before marriage, lust, etc. I think where someone’s expectations for chapter 2 might be let down is if they were anticipating a lot of content about category 3, or even category 2, whereas the conversation around Jesus’ sexuality primarily focused around his being male and God choosing to reveal himself in a clear, gender binary, way. There’s a lot to be gleaned here and I don’t want to dismiss it, but I think many want to hear more about how Jesus related to women. Did he have crushes on them? Could he have been same sex attracted and that’s one of the reason he stayed single? Or even, did he masturbate? Those might sound crass, but I think those are the types of mysterious questions that percolate around the phrase “The Sexuality of Jesus,” not delving into him being male. I understand the point Wilson was making, and I think it’s a good point, I think it’s just taking me some time (and I think others in the book club agree) warming up to the idea that the definition of “sexuality” is broader than I/we anticipated.
Wilson did do a good job of addressing the significance of Jesus being celibate and single. This led to the shining point of these two chapters, which I’ll address in a moment.
I want to get the other weakness out of the way first, which was from chapter 3 in addressing gender. “Male, Female, and the Imago Dei” was a good technical / theological treatise on gender from Scripture. One I will likely cite in future writing and sermons. But what I kept waiting for and never came was compassion for those who struggle with gender dysphoria. The tone of the chapter assumed that people always choose to struggle with their gender. I am sure that some do choose to want to be the other gender based on a trend or social pressure or just because, but many of the personal stories I have read about and those I know personally didn’t choose to want to be different than their biological sex, the way you choose your breakfast cereal or choose to rob a bank. These individuals were overwhelmed from the inside out that they really are a different gender than what they see in the mirror, like they are trapped in their own body. It’s more than I can put into words here, but if they could convince themselves otherwise, they certainly would have. I don’t disagree with Wilson’s biblical argument and I think it’s a helpful roadmap for the Church, but it lacked pastoral care for the person actually dealing with the struggle. I think it would have felt more preachy than helpful to someone looking for help who was neck-deep in the struggle, but looking for a biblical path to walk. It reminded me of 15-20 years ago when most of the Church was still convinced people chose to be gay, and we taught the biblical truths about homosexuality with that tone. Whereas now, almost everyone (including Wilson, as he writes about) acknowledges that many do not choose their orientation and can’t change it even though they have tried. This doesn’t change the biblical commands for how we all are to live out our sexuality, but it certainly changes our approach to how we teach on the subject and how we interact with those in the midst of the struggle. While I understand Mere Sexuality is meant to be more of a theological handbook, a compassionate pastoral section written toward those who struggle with gender dysphoria would have made a nice addition to this chapter.
Switching gears, I loved what Wilson did in chapters 2 and 3 as he compared the opposite way the world views the priority of sexual activity and the priority of biological sex, versus what Jesus and Scripture lays out. Essentially, culture today tells you that you aren’t living unless you are having sex. People start having sex at very young ages and they continue seeking it out with abandon for most of their lives. Do what your body tells you to do. Having sex seems as important to our culture as food or oxygen. You contrast that with Jesus and he never had sex! Jesus was also the ideal version of a human. He had everything he needed without having sex with anyone. He got these things from the love of the Father and from companionship with friends and community around him. Wilson’s point becomes even more profound as he swings the comparison the other direction and you find the same polarities. While having sex means everything to our culture, being biologically sexed as male or female means almost nothing. You can swap out your biological sex, or choose one of many gender options. Meanwhile, Jesus was firmly a male and was born firmly from a female. God revealed himself in very firm binary genders (male Jesus from female Mary). The creation account affirms that we are indeed created in God’s image, male and female (Genesis 1:27). Biological sex is a gift from God that reflects the very essence of who he is.
For those in the Flip Side Book Club, please only answer 2 of the following questions in the comment section. (Please do not answer all of them).
Please also leave a reply on two of the comments from other book club members.
Comments are due by Dec. 6th. My post on Chapters 4 & 5 will publish on Dec. 13th.
1. What new information did chapter 2 provide for you about Jesus’ sexuality and how was that helpful? What information were you hoping this chapter would address that it failed to (if any)?
2. On the bottom of page 42, Wilson makes a list of questions. Choose one to give an answer to here. (What might Jesus’ sexuality mean for how we think about human sexuality and homosexuality? Is there moral or theological significance to the fact that Jesus was born of a virgin? Is there moral or theological significance to the fact Jesus lived a chaste and celibate life? Is there moral or theological significance to the fact Jesus never married? Is there moral or theological significance to the fact Jesus’ resurrection body is a male body?)
3. Wilson dives into the very controversial subject of the role of men and women (arguing for the complementation side, as opposed to the egalitarian side). Which side of this debate do you typically fall on and did Wilson’s arguments sway you? What were the strengths and weaknesses of his argument?
4. Thinking of page 53, how can a person have deep intimacy and companionship without having sex?
5. Jesus “took on human flesh and lived a sexually fulfilled, sexually chaste, sacrificial life–all for the sake of others (p. 59).” How can this truth, combined with the previous truth that Jesus can sympathize with our weakness because he’s experienced it (Hebrews 4:14-16), help a person who is struggling with same sex attraction? …help a person who is struggling with transgenderism? …help a person who is struggling in their sexual purity?
6. How has postmodernism (“I determine what is true for me”) influenced the popular view of universalism (“all will be saved, all roads lead to God”)? How has that mindset affected our culture’s view of sexuality and gender?
Related posts:
He is:
Author of Beyond the Battle: A man's guide to his identity in Christ in an oversexualized world
Host of the The Flip Side Podcast
Join an online men's small group led by Noah and team at BeyondTheBattle.net
- Ep.108: Anonymous Venezuelan Pastor on Ministry Amidst Oppression - December 3, 2024
- Ep. 107: Mark & Beth Denison on Betrayal Trauma - November 4, 2024
- When “I follow the Lamb, not the Donkey or the Elephant” falls short - October 31, 2024
1. Before I read this chapter, I don’t think I had ever thought about the sexuality of Jesus,at least not this closely. The main point that stuck out to me was His celibacy, and how that reveals sexual intimacy as unessential to a fulfilled life, but relationship with the Father is. This leaves us with no excuse for any voluntary sexual sin.
2.What I find significance in the fact that Jesus never married, is that we could assume that He suffered in another way that every human has, loneliness, or a desire for lifelong physical and emotional partnership with another person. This is significant in the fact that a relationship with the Father is more than enough, despite temptations. I also found it interesting, when he talked about how some think temptation is not significant if Jesus never gave into it. It is painful when a temptation appears to promise the world, and friends may even tell you that its as fulfilling as it looks, but Jesus’ life would prove otherwise. This is where we make the same mistake that every sin is committed through, choosing our own wills over God’s, with the delusion that we are even nearly capable of making our own moral compass. The death and destruction throughout history seems to prove what happens when we do, especially when realizing that there is estimated to be roughly the same amount of death in the century at the summit of human intellect, the 20th century, than all of recorded history before.
Thanks for the great reply Jayson! I think I was too hard on Wilson’s chapter 2 as time has passed since I wrote my reflection on chapters 2 and 3. I think he did a good job of focusing on Jesus’ celibacy, as you point out. There is a huge wealth of truth we can dive into here, namely to call out sex (and even marriage) for the idol it is in our culture. Jesus demonstrated, and Wilson starts to hint at this, that a person can experience relational intimacy through community and friendships, and that sexual / erotic intimacy is not required for a fulfilled life. This is where I was going with discussion question #4. Thankful to Wilson to get us thinking in this direction.
That’s a great point in your second paragraph about the death and destruction today at the zenith of human intellect. We think we are so smart, we are own gods. We literally (as a society) have eliminated God altogether. Yet look at us. I’ve often thought of depression, anxiety, and suicide rates being higher today than ever before. I suffer from depression and anxiety, so am not shaming anyone here. But it’s a key observation. If our godless culture were so smart and we think we are capable of such utopia doing things our own way, why do things seem to be getting worse instead of better???
Hey guys,
Sorry I’m late.
1. I know Jayson already hit number 1, but I want to add my thoughts as well. I think I shared some of your reaction to it, Noah, in that I felt it was less than I was expecting. I was hoping Wilson might touch on the questions you gave voice to and expand just a little more.
I have realized as I’ve been reading that I have also lost sight of the humanity of Jesus. On page 43, Wilson says that, “a sincere desire to uphold the majesty of Christ leads inadvertently to the church losing contact with Jesus’ actual humanity.” I was also struck by his subsequent Clark Kent/Superman metaphor. Humanity wasn’t a façade for Jesus, it was a part of who he truly was. He struggled with sexual temptations that I have struggled with, and probably some that I haven’t. Sure, I knew that, but it seemed profound to me, nonetheless.
Jayson, your statement that we have no excuse for any voluntary sexual sin rings true as well. Wilson made mention of the fact that Jesus knew a greater extent of temptation than we ever have. Because He consistently resisted, he knew a greater strength in it than we know when we fold to it.
4. The excerpts from Justin Lee were truly difficult to grapple with. I’ve heard similar sentiments from a family member who has chosen a path similar to Justin. I emphatically believe that the Bible teaches against same sex marriage, and it’s easy for me to say celibacy is a better choice. But that ease comes from a lack of struggle with it. That can be s a hard truth for a same sex attracted person. It does not seem “fair.”
I do think that perception plays into it, though. In 1st Corinthians, Paul talks about singleness as a gift. He repeatedly tells us that it’s better to remain single. His perception was that it truly was. He knew, as Jesus did, that sexual activity was not a prerequisite of fulfillment. He poured himself into his ministry and his friendships with his traveling companions. I think our need for intimacy and companionship can be filled through friendship, and for someone without a marriage relationship, I think they are filled in a special way by God. Again, if you perceive singleness as a curse, that will be reality for you, but if you see it as a gift, you can find fulfillment in it.
Thanks Andrew. Yeah I love the point about how he showed much greater restraint / struggle BECAUSE he didn’t sin. I often think he couldn’t relate to me as much because he couldn’t struggle as much as I do. If he did, he would have surely fallen (that’s my subconscious thought), but since he didn’t fall, it must have been pretty easy on him, being God and all. Whereas Wilson makes the opposite point, which is super cool. I hadn’t thought of it that way and it’s very helpful as a new point of relation with Jesus.
Good point also highlighting the humanity of Jesus. We are definitely pendulum swingers. In fact most of the heresies throughout Church history have been one extreme or the other: either Jesus is so amazing that he was just God posing as a human, or he was so human that there’s no way he could be God because that’s crazy. I think our culture at large is in the 2nd heresy, you hear a lot of “well he was a good teacher, but not God”, whereas Evangelicals tend to drift toward the first.
I think your #4 is well said Andrew. I have read Justin Lee’s book “Torn” as a gay / same sex attracted Christian friend of mine had read it and it really messed with him. Lee’s story is so compelling, but his handling of Scripture in the last two chapters is brutal. So you are left choosing between Scripture or experience, and most today choose experience. I like what you said about perspective on gift v. curse. I am always grateful whenever I hear the Church give dignity to singleness, rather than treat it as a stigma. I try to do this in chapter 1 of Beyond the Battle and have gotten more compliments on that chapter than any other in the book.